Filed in: Main.HomePage · Modified on : Thu, 12 May 22
|
Paragraphs: for a new paragraph, use a blank line; |
Line break: \\ or [[<<]] |
|
-> to indent text, -< hanging text |
Join line: \ |
|
Lists: * for bulleted, # for numbered, :term:definition for definition lists | |
|
Emphasis:
''italics''
'''bold'''
'''''bold italics'''''
@@ | |
|
References: [[another page]], [[http://example.com/]], [[another page | link text]], [[#anchor]], [[#anchor | link text]] | |
|
Groups: [[Group/Page]] displays Page, [[Group.Page]] displays Group.Page, [[Group(.Page)]] displays Group, [[Group/]] links Group homepage | |
|
Separators: !!, !!! for headings, ---- for horizontal line |
Prevent formatting: [=...=] |
|
Other:
[+big+]
[++bigger++]
[-small-]
[--smaller--]
'^superscript^'
'_subscript_'
{+inserted+}
{- |
Preformatted: [@...@] or >>pre<<...>><< |
Page is unsaved
US dollars http://www.osov.cz/pharmacy/uk-health-janj.pdf senior pharmacy How come in any western supported third world elections, if the opposition wins, the elections were free and fair. But if the incumbent regime wins, the elections were full of irregularities. Case in point: Zimbabwe. AU and SADC say elections were free and fair not withstanding some glitches. But most western media quotes a western sponsored local group which the opposition is riding its cocktails. This group immediately condemned the election process esp the voters’ roll and mdc bought that.
End of preview -- remember to save
Top