Filed in: Main.HomePage · Modified on : Thu, 12 May 22
|
Paragraphs: for a new paragraph, use a blank line; |
Line break: \\ or [[<<]] |
|
-> to indent text, -< hanging text |
Join line: \ |
|
Lists: * for bulleted, # for numbered, :term:definition for definition lists | |
|
Emphasis:
''italics''
'''bold'''
'''''bold italics'''''
@@ | |
|
References: [[another page]], [[http://example.com/]], [[another page | link text]], [[#anchor]], [[#anchor | link text]] | |
|
Groups: [[Group/Page]] displays Page, [[Group.Page]] displays Group.Page, [[Group(.Page)]] displays Group, [[Group/]] links Group homepage | |
|
Separators: !!, !!! for headings, ---- for horizontal line |
Prevent formatting: [=...=] |
|
Other:
[+big+]
[++bigger++]
[-small-]
[--smaller--]
'^superscript^'
'_subscript_'
{+inserted+}
{- |
Preformatted: [@...@] or >>pre<<...>><< |
Page is unsaved
I'm afraid that number's ex-directory http://www.futurebydesign.com/lidocaine-blue-tattoo-numbing-gel-near-me-sphj.pdf lidocaine poeder kopen belgie While the effectiveness of different rules can vary, this regulatory accumulation is hurting the U.S. economy. A study in the June issue of the "Journal of Economic Growth" – authored by John Dawson of Appalachian State University and John Seater of North Carolina State University – estimates that federal regulations have reduced economic growth by about 2 percent per year between 1949 and 2005. They find that if federal regulations were still at levels seen in the year 1949, current GDP would be $38.8 trillion higher. While that number seems extraordinarily high, a number of other studies have similarly concluded that regulatory accumulation slows down economic growth.
End of preview -- remember to save
Top